The forestry giant is suing the environmental
group for $5 million for "defamation, malicious falsehood and intentional
interference with economic relations."The claim relates to a Greenpeace campaign,
beginning in 2012, that was critical of Resolute's forest practices. Greenpeace asked the court on Thursday to strike
down Resolute's claim of intentional interference.
Lawyer Jordan Goldblatt argued that Resolute had not shown the court that the company suffered financial losses related to the environmental group's interactions with its customers.But the lawyer for Resolute said the company is unable to make those connections until it has full disclosure from Greenpeace about its tactics.
Lawyer Jordan Goldblatt argued that Resolute had not shown the court that the company suffered financial losses related to the environmental group's interactions with its customers.But the lawyer for Resolute said the company is unable to make those connections until it has full disclosure from Greenpeace about its tactics.